Published Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:13:08 -0500 on Seeking Alpha
I have on occasion seen the equation put forth here on Seeking Alpha that Dividend Yield plus Dividend Growth equals Return. This is a mathematical fallacy. To quote the ever wise David Van Knapp: it's like "adding the speed of a car to its acceleration--the result makes no sense." But why do some dividend investors continue to cite this as a metric? I considered my own previous article in this series. In this article, I analyzed something that I know dividend investors intuitively understand...there is an inverse mathematical relationship between dividend yield and dividend growth. In other words, to end up with an equal result over some time period, a stock with a lower current dividend yield must have a higher growth rate than a stock with a higher current yield. Unfortunately, I think a few investors (perhaps understandably) extrapolate this relationship to conclude that it is perfectly symmetric...i.e. at...
|Stock name||Last trade||P/E||Earnings/Share||Dividend/Share||Dividend yield|
|PROCTER & GAMBLE||86.58||23.2||3.74||2.68||3.08|
|JOHNSON & JOHNSON||115.70||20.5||5.65||3.20||2.81|
Older articles featuring At&t (T):My Dividend Growth Portfolio - Q3 2016 Summary
Dividend Growth Investing To Fill-The-Gap
Fredrik Follower Fave Dividend Dogs: 55 Safe Out Of 130 In October
My Third Quarter Portfolio Review - Focus On Dividend Growth And Quality
DGI Portfolio Online Tracker POT3.0; Including Historical Dividend Data
Coach Is Top Gaining Strategic Dividend Index Dog For Fall
Free Market Capitalist September Dividend Income
Dividend Champion Portfolio - October Update
6 Dividend Stocks Still Trading At 2007 Prices
Is It Better To Invest In Growth Over Dividends For Young Investors?