Published Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:13:08 -0500 on Seeking Alpha
I have on occasion seen the equation put forth here on Seeking Alpha that Dividend Yield plus Dividend Growth equals Return. This is a mathematical fallacy. To quote the ever wise David Van Knapp: it's like "adding the speed of a car to its acceleration--the result makes no sense." But why do some dividend investors continue to cite this as a metric? I considered my own previous article in this series. In this article, I analyzed something that I know dividend investors intuitively understand...there is an inverse mathematical relationship between dividend yield and dividend growth. In other words, to end up with an equal result over some time period, a stock with a lower current dividend yield must have a higher growth rate than a stock with a higher current yield. Unfortunately, I think a few investors (perhaps understandably) extrapolate this relationship to conclude that it is perfectly symmetric...i.e. at...
|Stock name||Last trade||P/E||Earnings/Share||Dividend/Share||Dividend yield|
|PROCTER & GAMBLE||80.99||30.4||2.66||2.65||3.32|
|JOHNSON & JOHNSON||101.82||19.5||5.23||3.00||2.95|
Older articles featuring At&t (T):My 4% Dividend Yield Portfolio: Stocks Are Not Just Papers
4 Consistently High Paying Dividend Stocks With Growth Potential
Dividend Investors: Time To Rethink Verizon And AT&T
Will Dividend Stocks Save You In A Bear Market?
The Monday Morning Kickoff - Re-Thinking Growth Prospects And Favoring Dividend Stocks
Doubling Your Dividend Aristocrat Yield
Dividend Aristocrats Part 51: AT&T
Is Western Union The Best Dividend-Paying Company In The S&P 500?
Another Dividend Aristocrat Beating The Market, With Estimates Rising, Reports This Week
Verizon: Little Dividend Growth Makes It An Overvalued Stock